Sponsored Links
-->

Friday, June 29, 2018

Flores vs Nguyen HIGHLIGHTS: February 21, 2017 - PBC on FS1 - YouTube
src: i.ytimg.com

Flores-Figueroa v. United States, 556 U.S. 646 (2009), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, holding that the law enhancing the sentence for identity theft requires proof that an individual knew that the identity card or number he had used belonged to another, actual person. Simply using a Social Security Number is not sufficient connection to another individual.


Video Flores-Figueroa v. United States



Background

Ignacio Flores-Figueroa, an illegal alien from Mexico, used a counterfeit Social Security card bearing his real name and a false Social Security number to obtain employment at a steel plant in East Moline, Illinois. Though he did not know it, the number belonged to a real person, a minor. The question in the case was whether workers who use false Social Security and alien registration numbers must know that they belong to a real person to be subject to a two-year sentence extension for "aggravated identity theft."

Specifically, the case hinged on whether the adverb "knowingly" applies only to the verb or also to the object in 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(1) (which defines aggravated identity theft): "Whoever [...] knowingly transfers, possesses, or uses, without lawful authority, a means of identification of another person [...]".


Maps Flores-Figueroa v. United States



Opinion of the Court

In a unanimous decision delivered by Justice Breyer on May 4, 2009, the Court held that a prosecutor must be able to show that a defendant knew that the identification he used actually belonged to another person.


106 lbs. Eddie Flores (Northview) vs Jonathan Prata (Downey) - YouTube
src: i.ytimg.com


See also

  • List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 556
  • Mens rea
  • Morissette v. United States (1952)

Impact of Financial Incentives on Early and Late Adopters among US ...
src: f1.media.brightcove.com


References


March 2017 Prospect of the Month: Miguel Flores - YouTube
src: i.ytimg.com


Further reading

  • Liptak, Adam (2008-10-20). "Justices Take Case on Illegal Workers and Penalties for Identity Theft". The New York Times. 
  • Stout, David (2009-05-04). "Supreme Court Rules Against Government in Identity-Theft Case". The New York Times. Retrieved 2009-05-04. 
  • Traps, Leonid (2012). "'Knowingly' Ignorant: Mens Rea Distribution in Federal Criminal Law after Flores-Figueroa" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. 112 (3): 628-664. 

Manny Pacquiao VS Juan Manuel Marquez 5 - MARQUEZ IS NOT ...
src: i.ytimg.com


External links

  • Text of Flores-Figueroa v. United States, 556 U.S. 646 (2009) is available from:  Cornell  CourtListener  Findlaw  Google Scholar  Justia  Oyez 


Source of article : Wikipedia